Johanna Faust, a mixed race Jew, prefers to publish pseudonymously. She is committed: first, to preventing war, ecological disaster, and nuclear apocalypse; last to not only fighting for personal privacy & the freedom of information, but, by representing herself as a soldier in that fight, to exhorting others to do the same. She is a poet, always. All these efforts find representation here: "ah, Mephistophelis" is so named after the last line of Christopher Marlowe's Dr. Faustus, whose heretical success flouted the censor for a time.

Breaking: Discovery Makes Nuclear Energy Obsolete

click to enlarge or view at Wikipedia.

 Well, that ought to have been the title.  Instead, the article "Making Steam Without Boiling Water, Thanks To Nanoparticles" described the newly discovered properties of nanoscale carbon or gold coated silica dioxide and then, when describing the implications, mumbled something-or-other about making tea in the arctic, or something. Here's the quote:

It is possible to create steam within seconds by focusing sunlight on nanoparticles mixed into water, according to new research.

That observation, reported Monday by scientists at Rice University in Texas, suggests myriad applications in places that lack electricity or burnable fuels. A sun-powered boiler could desalinate sea water, distill alcohol, sterilize medical equipment and perform other useful tasks.

Read more  

Now, the article knows you will be skeptical,as well you should be, Gentle reader:  however, the explanation, such as it is, pans out.   Add this fine, fine dust to water, focus sunlight on it, and, even if the water is chilled, and without heating the water appreciably, SHAZAM!  Steam forms almost instantaneously.  80% efficiency (compare to tops around 17% for solar). Cheap to make, the nanoparticles, essentially a catalyst, may be used again and again.  Really?  Really.

Solar, Efficiency by Manufacturer.  Source.
So unless I have lost my mind, that means that if you do this in an enclosed container -- let's call it a reactor -- well, you could turn some turbines, no?  Steam -- making steam -- isn't that what nuclear reactors do? So now we can replace the horribly expensive, nasty, dangerous, evil nuclear fuel with a substance that, though I am sure it has it's downside (what happens if it gets out -- into the water supply -- or in -- into our bodies?) I cannot imagine it is anywhere near as stupidly insane (or is that insanely stupid) as nuclear fuel.

In the apparatus designed by the Rice team, steam forms in a vessel of water long before the water becomes warm to the touch. It is, in effect, possible to turn a container of water into steam before it gets hot enough to boil.

Read more  

Of this rather obvious implication, not a peep from either from David Brown (the author of the Washington Times article), nor any other source that has come to my attention to date.  As if sharing an in-joke, however, he does mention "as James Watt and other 18th-century inventors showed, if you can generate steam easily, you can create an industrial revolution." Funny.  Funnier that the next sentence refers to the research's sponsorship -- Bill and Melinda Gates -- "in the hope it might prove useful to developing countries.."

I have reproduced the article via screenshot, below.  Click to enlarge.


Be seeing you.


  1. Most interesting, thanks. I followed the links and reached this other article at Solar Daily, which is much in the line you said: perplex for the narrowness of their conclusions.

    They are reporting after all 80% efficiency in solar energy conversion!!! Your usual solar panel has only 15% instead.

    I agree that, without knowing yet the details in full or if there could be some sort of hidden "but", the discovery seems absolutely revolutionary. Potentially it would not just replace nuclear and nearly every other form of electricity generation but it would also, as it is so "magically" portable and small sized (it's nano, right?) be used at such decentralized level that energy corporations would collapse in no time.

    Yeah, flippant!

  2. There are those in finance that will make every effort to make sure this product will never reach the market. Those who control the monopoly on energy won't roll over either. I hope for the best, expect the worst.

  3. So, the obvious question is unanswered??? What is this nanoparticle, how do we make it, or where can we acquire it? Without this information the article is USELESS. All that will happen is the PTB will kill the story and we will never see the technology.
    It happens every time like clockwork.
    So, will the author(s) of these articles shed the necessary light to make this story meaningful, PLEASE?